Saving Marriages in Arizona
I no longer have the letter I recently received so as to quote it exactly, but it was a letter and a questionnaire from an Arizona group that had as part of its banner Saving Marriages in Arizona. It asked me to volunteer to call or go house to house to get signatures on a petition that would prevent or at least diminish the possibility for same gender marriages within our state, implying that by so doing I would save the institution of marriage.
I returned the questionnaire with comments that I am sure they didn't appreciate, for my first thought was "Whose marriage are they seeking to save?" Mine? If two same gender people succeed in getting legally married does that mean that my marriage is null and void? Does it mean that my commitment now has been diminished or somehow tainted by the choice of another? I don't think so. And, does it now mean that an overwhelming number of young people will begin to look at others who share their same genitalia structuring but now with the thought of marriage? I don't think so.
Fear is an ugly thing, for in this instance it is seeking to make another wrong, very wrong, so that they can be right, so that they can feel good about themselves. "But the Bible says," my clergy brethren and others would say. The Bible says many things about societal values and couches much in very stringent rules with horrendous and often lethal outcomes for violations. Yet many of the laws stated within the Bible would be laughed at today if we sought to apply them, for we would run afoul of the current laws of our land. So, we pick and choose not the things that give us reason to exercise the overt ancient ordinances that call for an eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth, for the laws of today would not allow this, but now many settle upon such things as gay or lesbian issues. "Would you want your son to marry another man?" "Would you want your daughter to have sex with another woman?"
And the fires are fanned by those who seem to live for the opportunity to point a finger at some and use the label, sinner. So, as you read this guest editorial, can you remember the day when you made the choice to see in the opposite sex someone attractive and even desirable? Probably not. Probably it was just a natural sequencing of thought and feeling as something within you now began to see in another something that was sexually attractive. What if, just what if, for you that other person shared the same basic plumbing that you have, and no matter what you were told by others, or tried to make it disappear and go away, that urge or desire just wouldn't go away, then finding someone you wanted to share your life and were told that the same basic rights afforded to opposite gender couples was not there for you? I would feel singled out and denied my basic rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
If this be a sin, then Jesus spoke to that asking anyone who was without sin to cast the first stone. A number of months ago as I watched reports on television of same gender couples being married I saw such love in their eyes. When love is present, can this be wrong or sinful? This clergyman doesn't think so. I believe that God is but love and whenever love is present, then I am not about to cast the first or subsequent stone. If love isn't present, then that isn't my issue, but another's. Does either scenario affect my marriage and commitment? Of course not. I believe the world be a better place if we just lived our lives and allowed others to live theirs, and that the best gift we can give is loving acceptance of another, especially when another's liberty, life or limb isn't being threatened. If a gay marriage diminishes any reader of this writing, get a grip, put this energy toward solving world hunger and the planet's need for peace, things worthy of energy and time.
I am called sexually straight, but to my gay and lesbian brothers and sisters I give a gift of acceptance, and a prayer that you might peacefully find fulfillment, acceptance and love in your journey of life.
The above was submitted to the Tucson Citizen as a guest editorial. And published by them 6/21